Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


MOSTLY.

[00:00:02]

ALL RIGHT, THE TIME IS NOW 2 0 3.

I'M USING THE STAPLE FOR THE GAVEL, SO IF I STAPLE MY HAND AND SCREAM, JUST KNOW THAT'S WHY.

UM, I AM MANUEL BARKER.

I'M THE CHAIR WE HAVE WITH US LEGISLATOR ANDERSON.

AND I HAVE ASKED LEGISLATOR HUSKY TO JOIN US AS WELL, UH, TO FILL IN, UH, THE THIRD PARTY SEAT, UM, ORDINANCES COMMITTEE.

WE HAVE NONE

[ORDINANCES IN COMMITTEE]

RESOLUTIONS AND COMMITTEE 2 2 2 0 7

[RESOLUTIONS IN COMMITTEE]

[22207 A RESOLUTION transferring $42,857.00 within the 2026 General Fund and awarding a contract for the purchase of communication equipment for use by the Sheriff’s Office to MRA International, Inc., of Long Branch, NJ under the terms and conditions of Invitation to Bid No. 25-057, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $42,857.00.]

A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING $42,857 WITHIN THE 2026 GENERAL FUND AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FOR THE USE BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO MRA INTERNATIONAL INC.

OF LONG BRANCH, NEW JERSEY UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF INVITATION TO BID NUMBER 25 DASH 0 5 7 AT AN ACTUAL COST OF THE COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,857.

WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE ISSUE? GO FOR IT.

PERFECT.

WHO KNOWS WHAT TO DO? YAY.

THAT'S ME AGAIN.

.

SO DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON IT WENT THROUGH FULL BID.

IT WAS APPROVED BY THE SHERIFF, TALKING TO THE MICROPHONE.

SURE.

IF IT MOVES.

OH, WHAT IS IT? I GUESS WE DON'T, OBVIOUSLY WE HAVE THE BACKGROUND, BUT, SO THERE HEADSETS, UH, COMMS DEVICE THAT PROTECT HEARING PROTECTION AND ALSO AMPLIFY AMBIENT NOISE UNTIL HEARING PROTECTION IS REQUIRED.

OH, THANK YOU.

SORRY.

AND THE GAINFUL SPIN.

ALL RIGHT.

ANY DISCUSSION OR ACTIONS HERE? MOVE TO ADOPT.

ALRIGHT, I SECOND BEEN MOVED IN.

SECONDED.

UM, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? THE AYES HAVE IT.

YOU CAN LEAVE IT ON THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

UM, THANK YOU, UH, FOR JOINING US AND FOR YOUR SERVICE.

2, 2, 2, 1, 1.

[22211 A RESOLUTION awarding a contract for the purchase of mobile radios for use by the Sheriff’s Office to Motorola Solutions, Inc., of Chicago, IL, under the terms and conditions of MARC/KCRPC Contract No. 113, an existing competitively bid government contract, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $109,568.00.]

RESOLUTION AWARDING AND CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MOBILE RADIOS FOR THE USE BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TO MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, ANCHORAGE, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

UNDER THE TERMS OF AND CONDITIONS OF MARK K-C-R-P-C CONTRACT NUMBER 1 1 3.

AN EXISTING COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT AND AN ACTUAL COST OF THE COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $109,568.

YES, SIR.

UH, SERGEANT MIKE MILLER, CHECK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

UM, THESE ARE FOR, UH, 14, UH, CAR RADIOS THAT GOES INTO OUR PATROL VEHICLES.

UH, AS YOU KNOW, THESE ARE LIFELINE OF THE DEPUTIES, UM, UH, WITH DISPATCH AND OTHER AGENCIES AND OUTSIDE AGENCIES.

UH, SO THESE ARE NEEDED FOR OUR, UH, NEW VEHICLES AND, UM, TOUCH.

ALRIGHT, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS OR THOUGHTS? UM, ON RESOLUTION? 2, 2, 2.

ONE, ONE.

ALL RIGHT.

HEARING NONE, ACTIONS MOVE TO ADOPT A SECOND.

BEEN MOVED IN SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

UH, ANY AGAINST? THE AYES HAVE IT.

THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

2 2 2 1 2.

[22212 A RESOLUTION declaring certain vehicles assigned to the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office as surplus property and authorizing their transfer to the Jackson County Department of Civil Process.]

A RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN VEHICLES ASSIGNED TO THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF THE JACKSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL PROCESS.

UH, WHO IS HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT? DON'T BE SCARED.

YOU WANNA HOLD? OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

UH, SERGEANT MIKE MILLER, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

UH, WE RECENTLY, UH, HE DIDN'T WANNA COME UP CLOSE.

, UH, HE WANTED TO SIT NEXT TO THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE.

OH, OVER HERE? WE RECENTLY OKAY.

HE RECENTLY SURPLUS VEHICLES AND, UH, THEY CAME TO US AND ASKED US IF WE HAVE VEHICLES THEY CAN, UH, WE CAN DONATE TO THEM, WHICH WE PICKED OUT THE SURPLUS VEHICLE, THE BEST TWO VEHICLES WE HAD.

AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE, AND CURRENT, CURRENTLY THE, UH, CIVIL PROCESS PEOPLE, UH, ANTHONY KELLY, CFO.

UH, CURRENTLY THEY'RE USING THEIR OWN CARS, BEING PAID MILEAGE.

AND SO THIS IS AN IN AN EFFORT TO BUILD UP, UH, A GROUP OF CARS THAT WE CAN USE SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO USE THEIR OWN VEHICLES.

LOVE IT.

UM, ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR THOUGHTS? UH, I HAVE ONE, BUT I WANT TO INQUIRE FIRST.

ALL RIGHT.

UM, SO IT SOUNDS LIKE THIS WAS A REQUEST FROM CIVIL PROCESS OFFICE TO YOU ALL.

DO YOU ALL DO ANY OF THESE TYPES OF SIMILAR AGREEMENTS WITH EITHER OTHER DEPARTMENTS OR MUNICIPALITIES THAT UH, YES.

UH, WE, WE'VE DONE WITH PUBLIC WORKS IN THE PAST.

UH, PUBLIC WORKS CAME TO US AND THEY USUALLY HAVE PER DID ON WHATEVER SURPLUS VEHICLES WE, WE HAVE, IF ANY OF 'EM WERE SPENDING THE MONEY ON FIXING UP.

UM, AND THEN THEY DO THAT.

SO, YES.

UH, WE ALSO DONATED A VEHICLE TO, UH, FORD SAGE HIGH SCHOOL IN THE PAST, UM, FOR THEIR USE FOR THEIR, UH, POLICE TRAINING PROGRAM.

THEY HAVE SO AWESOME FOR THE STUDENTS.

I APPRECIATE THAT, THAT BACKGROUND.

THAT'S AMAZING THAT WE DO THAT.

AND KUDOS TO YOU AND THE SHERIFF FOR THAT PROCESS AND, AND THIS EFFORT.

SO,

[00:05:01]

UH, WITH THAT, I'D SEEK, UH, UH, AN ADOPTION FOR 2, 2 2 1 2.

MOVE TO THERE A SECOND.

I SECOND IT.

IT'S BEEN MOVED IN.

SECONDED.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? ENC CARRIED BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? APPEARS AYES HAVE IT.

THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

2 2 2 2 5.

[22225 A RESOLUTION awarding a contract for the purchase of fifteen (15) new 2026 Dodge Durango vehicles for use by the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office to Corwin Motors of Springfield, LLC, of Springfield, MO, under the terms and conditions of State of Missouri Contract No. MC250182004, an existing competitively bid government contract, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $645,420.00.]

A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF 15 NEW 2 20 26 DODGE DURANGO VEHICLES FOR USE BY THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF CORWIN MOTORS OF SPRINGFIELD, LLC OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI.

UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STATE OF MISSOURI.

CONTRACT NUMBER MC 2 5 1 8 204.

AN EXISTING COMPETITIVE GOVERNMENT CONTRACT AND AN ACTUAL COST TO THE COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $645,420.

SERGEANT MIKE MILLER, OBJECT, COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

UH, THESE 15 VEHICLES, UH, WE DO 15 VEHICLES A YEAR, UM, FOR THE PAST COUPLE YEARS NOW, UH, THESE VEHICLES GONNA BE REPLACING SOME OF THE OLDER VEHICLES WITH HIGHER MILEAGE.

UH, SOME OF THESE VEHICLES WITH HIGHER MILEAGE.

THE WE'LL GO TO OUR EXTRA VEHICLES FOR, SAY IF SOMEONE'S DOWN FOR MAINTENANCE OR GETTING AN ACCIDENT OR SOMETHING, WE HAVE ANOTHER VEHICLE THEY, THEY CAN BE PUT IN.

UM, AND THEN THE ONES THAT ARE REAL HIGH MILEAGE WITH VERY, UH, MECHANICAL ISSUES AND STUFF LIKE THAT, THOSE WILL BE PLACED ON THE SURPLUS FOR THE FOLLOWING YEAR.

UM, MAKES SENSE.

WHAT, WHAT IF YOU KNOW OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD IS THE SIZE OF THE FLEET TOTAL? JUST TO GET AN IDEA.

I, AT TOP OF MY HEAD, I WOULD NOT KNOW.

WE USUALLY HAVE ONE VEHICLE PER PERSON, WHICH WE ARE CURRENTLY AT 110, I BELIEVE.

AND THEN SOME SOUNDS LIKE A RESERVE POOL, WHICH IS IMPORTANT.

RIGHT.

AND THEN SOME EXTRA ONES IN CASE THAT HAPPENS AS WELL.

SO, OKAY.

UM, ALL RIGHT.

THAT, THAT IS HELPFUL.

ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR THOUGHTS? THAT'S A LOT OF MONEY FOR VEHICLES.

.

ARE THESE, SORRY, ARE THESE FULLY EQUIPPED? IS THAT WHY? ONE OF THE REASONS FOR THE HIGH COST? YEAH.

THE PORTFOLIO EQUIPMENT.

OKAY.

SO THEY HAVE ALL OF THE MECHANICAL COMPONENTS, EVERYTHING, YES.

SO THAT, I THINK THAT DEFINITELY MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE THAT THEY'RE ALREADY THAT WAY LOOKING FOR MOTION, THEN MOVE TO ADOPT SECOND.

SECOND, THEN MOVED AND SECONDED.

ALL THOSE, UM, OR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR FOR AND, UH, RESOLUTION 2, 2 2 2 5.

PLEASE INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

THE AYES.

I'M SORRY.

ANY OPPOSED? THE AYES APPEAR TO HAVE IT.

THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

UH, 2 2 2 2 8.

A RESOLUTION

[22228 A RESOLUTION awarding a seven month term and supply contract, with two (2) twelve month options to extend, for the furnishing of law enforcement public safety gear for use by various County departments to G.T. Distributors, Inc., of Pflugerville, TX under the terms and conditions of State of Missouri Contract No. CC250070 (007), an existing competitively bid government contract.]

AWARDING A SEVEN MONTH TERM AND SUPPLY CONTRACT WITH TWO 12 MONTH OPTIONS TO EXTEND FOR THE FURNISHING OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY GEAR FOR USE BY THE VARIOUS COUNTY DEPARTMENTS, GT DISTRIBUTORS INC.

OF PFLUGERVILLE, TEXAS UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STATE OF MISSOURI CONTRACT CC 2 500 0 7 0 0 7.

AN EXISTING COMPETITIVE BID CONTRACT.

UH, DISCUSSION ON THAT ONE, MR. CHAIRMAN MEMBERS, THIS IS JUST A, OUR COMPETITIVE BID CONTRACT TO GET PUBLIC SAFETY GEAR.

UM, I KNOW THIS IS NOT PROBABLY YOUR INTENDED, UH, SPEAKING, UM, EFFORT FOR THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AND I DO AGREE THAT THE SAFETY GEAR IS IMPORTANT.

UM, IS THERE A REASON WHY WE DIDN'T BID THIS OUT? BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE THERE ARE PROBABLY LOCAL VENDORS AND I COULD BE MAKING THAT COMPLETELY UP, THAT WOULD LOVE TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BID ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS.

I THINK, SEAN, YOU HAD EVEN SUGGESTED THERE'S LOCAL AMMUNITION SUPPLIERS AND I JUST, I WANT TO CREATE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR LOCAL FOLKS TO BID ON THIS KIND OF STUFF VERSUS TRYING TO USE, UM, YOU KNOW, THESE COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACTS THAT ARE WAY OUTSIDE OF OUR REGION.

WELL, I DO DO KNOW IT, IT IS UNDER THE STATE OF MISSOURI CONTRACT IS AN EXISTING COMPETITIVE BID GOVERNMENT CONTRACT THAT WAS DONE THAT WAY.

IN THE FUTURE, WE CAN DEFINITELY LOOK MORE LOCAL.

GO.

IF YOU ALL WANNA COME AND TALK TO, GO AHEAD.

YOU GOTTA COME TO THE MIC.

SO THAT RECORDING STUFF, SORRY.

GT DISTRIBUTORS IS RIGHT OUTSIDE OF KANSAS CITY.

IT'S JUST BARELY ACROSS THE COUNTY LINE.

OKAY.

SO IT'S PROBABLY LIKE A CORPORATE ENTITY.

CORPORATES, TEXAS.

OKAY.

THAT, THAT IS HELPFUL.

THANK YOU FOR THAT.

AND I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT MR. EXECUTIVE, I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN LOOK AT HOW WE, AND THAT MIGHT BE ON MY SIDE FROM THE, THE CLERK IS TO SEE HOW WE CAN GET THAT LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING.

'CAUSE I THINK THAT DOES MAKE A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE.

WHITNEY MILLER WITH THE COUNSELOR'S OFFICE.

WE COULD ALSO WORK TO MAKE SURE WE ADD THAT LANGUAGE IN.

ANYTIME WE'RE AWARE THAT THERE'S A LOCAL AFFILIATE OR AFFILIATE OR SOMETHING, WE'LL, WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO MAKE SURE THAT LANGUAGE IS ALWAYS IN THERE.

THANK YOU.

GOOD AFTERNOON, CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE.

ONE THING I WANTED TO ADD IS WE CURRENTLY USE A VENDOR BY THE NAME OF GALLS.

ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT WE'VE BEEN HAVING IS GALLS IS A LOCAL VENDOR, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE A LOCAL STORE THAT THEY HAVE ALL OF OUR UNIFORMS AND ALL OF OUR EQUIPMENT INSIDE OF.

SO SHOULD SOMEONE BE INVOLVED IN A CRITICAL INCIDENT AND NEED NEW EQUIPMENT RIGHT AWAY, WE DON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO JUST GO TO THAT STORE AND PICK IT UP.

SO WE TRY AND LOOK AT DIFFERENT STORES AND DIFFERENT OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE THAT EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT RIGHT AWAY.

AND WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT.

GT AS FAR AS THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE GOES, I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE REST OF THE COUNTY, BUT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS ABLE TO USE A LOT OF THEIR EQUIPMENT AND THEIR UNIFORMS MORE READILY AVAILABLE.

DO WE HAVE, UH, ANY COMPARISON TO LIKE KANSAS CITY PUBLIC OR POLICE DEPARTMENT OR ANYBODY ELSE WHO HAS, AND, AND THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT, BUT VENDORS ARE THAT, IS THAT AN ISSUE ACROSS MULTIPLE DEPARTMENTS THAT WE'RE AWARE OF OR? I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION

[00:10:01]

CURRENTLY.

SURE.

I'M NOT IN CHARGE OF OUR SUPPLY.

UH, WE CAN CERTAINLY GET THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU OR TRY AND, AND COLLECT IT UNLESS YOU HAVE IT, MR. COUNTY EXECUTIVE.

NOTHING.

ALL GOOD.

YEAH, JUST WANTED TO THROW THAT OUT THERE.

SO I, UM, TWO 12 MONTH OPTIONS, UM, IS, UH, FOUR YEARS.

SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S COGNIZANT.

I DON'T KNOW IF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IS OPEN TO MAYBE DOING A ONE SO THAT WE CAN LOOK AT THAT AND REBID IT IN THE NEXT CYCLE VERSUS IN A FOUR YEAR EXTENSION.

SO, 'CAUSE I DON'T THINK WE HAVE THE 2, 2, 2 2 YEAR TERMS. AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, GENERAL COUNSEL IS JUST CONTINUAL, IF YOU OPT FOR IT VERSUS IT COMING BACK TO THE LEGISLATURE.

IS THAT ANY I I, I DON'T THINK WE WOULD HAVE AN ISSUE.

CERTAINLY I WOULD WANNA CONFER WITH THE SUPPLY PEOPLE.

I WILL TELL YOU THAT NOW THAT WE'RE ALMOST FULLY, FULLY STAFFED, THAT'S A BENEFIT FOR US WHERE WE DON'T ANTICIPATE THIS COMING UP FOR 10, 20 PEOPLE AT A TIME LIKE WE HAVE IN THE PAST.

I WILL TELL YOU THOUGH, THAT I BELIEVE THIS AGREEMENT IS ALSO FOR OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY PARK RANGERS, UM, POSSIBLY CIVIL PROCESS IF THEY DO THAT AS WELL AS, WHO AM I MISSING, SIR? CORRECTIONS OF WORDS.

MAYBE CORRECTIONS FACILITIES, I'M SURE.

OKAY, SURE.

WELL, JUST AN OPPORTUNITY.

I DON'T, IT'S SUBJECT TO YOU ALL.

SO MOTION MOVE TO ADOPT.

I SECOND THEN MOVED AND SECONDED.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED AYES HAVE IT.

THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

UH, RESOLUTION 2, 2 2 3, 5.

[22235 A RESOLUTION authorizing the Prosecuting Attorney to execute an agreement with the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners for anti-drug and anti-crime law enforcement activities and programs at a cost to the County not to exceed $3,657,651.00.]

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PROSECUTOR'S, UH, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS FOR ANTI-DRUG AND ANTI-CRIME LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS THAT IT COST OF THE COUNTY NOT TO EXCEED $3,000,657 651 CENTS.

UM, I KNOW THAT I HAD ASKED, UH, THE COMBAT DIRECTOR TO, UH, HAVE KCPD JOIN US FOR THIS DISCUSSION.

UM, I DID NOT NOTICE THEM, THE SWIFTNESS OF THIS MEETING, SO I WOULD ASK THAT WE HOLD THIS UNTIL WE CAN BRING THEM BACK IN.

HAPPY TO HOLD ANOTHER MEETING TO HAVE IT KIND OF ON THIS.

IN THE PAST, WE HAVE, UH, GENERALLY GOTTEN A REPORT AND PERSPECTIVE ON WHAT THIS MONEY ACTUALLY PAYS FOR.

I THINK GIVEN WHAT WE HAVE TO DO FOR A RENEWAL, IT'S IMPORTANT AND PRUDENT THAT WE PUT THIS IN A FRONT AND CENTER ENVIRONMENT.

UM, ALSO OPEN TO ADVANCING THIS WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION AT THIS POINT, BRINGING IT TO LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE, MAKING IT A MORE FORMAL PROPOSAL IN FRONT OF THE ENTIRETY OF THE LEGISLATURE.

SO THAT'S FINE.

YOU CAN BRING IT TO I FINE LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE.

I'M, YEAH.

SO I WOULD SEEK A MOTION FOR, UM, I GUESS WAS IT ADOPTION OR MOVE TO ADVANCE TO, UH, THE LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION AT THIS POINT.

AND TEE IT UP FOR PRESENTATION.

I SECOND IT THAT YOU GOTTA YOU GOTTA SAY IT.

THAT YOU JUST MAKE THAT MOTION.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.

SORRY.

I CAN MOTION FROM THIS END.

UM, IT'S BEEN MOVED AND SECONDED.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO.

ALL RIGHT.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED AYES HAVE IT.

AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

2 2 2 3 7

[22237 A RESOLUTION awarding a contract for the replacement of HVAC systems at two radio communication tower sites for use by the Sheriff’s Office to Motorola Solutions, Inc., of Chicago, IL, under the terms and conditions of State of Missouri Contract No. MT250038001, an existing competitively bid government contract, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $76,002.00.]

A RESOLUTION AWARDING A CONTRACT WITH A REPLACEMENT OF HVAC SYSTEMS AT TWO RADIO COMMUNICATION TOWER SITES FOR USE BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE OF MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.

OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STATE OF MISSOURI.

CONTRACT NUMBER MT 2 500 0 3 8 0 0 1.

AN EXISTING COMPETITIVE BID CONTRACT, GOVERNMENT CONTRACT, AND AN ACTUAL COST OF THE COUNTY AND THE AMOUNT OF $76,002.

UM, CAPTAIN.

GOOD AFTERNOON.

CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY, UH, WITH JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHAIRMAN OF BARCA AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE AND OTHER LEGISLATORS.

UM, TODAY THE SHERIFFS AND THE INTERIM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND PURCHASING RECOMMEND THE AWARDED CONTRACT FOR THE FURNISHING, FURNISHING, EXCUSE ME, OF HVAC SYSTEMS ON TWO OF OUR RADIO COMMUNICATION TOWERS TO MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI CONTRACT.

CURRENTLY, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DISPATCHES FOR NOT ONLY MEMBERS OF THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BUT WE ALSO DISPATCH FOR SEVEN OTHER MUNICIPALITIES, THE CIVIL PROCESS DIVISION OF THE 16TH CIRCUIT, AND PERIODICALLY FOR THE PARK RANGERS AND DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION.

IN LAYMAN'S TERMS, OUR RADIO SIGNALS FOR THOSE AGENCIES AND TRANSMISSION TRANSMIT ACROSS DIFFERENT TOWERS ACROSS THE COUNTY.

AND CURRENTLY, LIKE ANY ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, THEY NEED CLIMATE CONTROL ENVIRONMENTS.

THIS LAST SUMMER, UNFORTUNATELY, WE REALIZED THAT THOSE EXISTING PIECES OF EQUIPMENT WERE SHOWING, UH, SIGNS OF DETERIORATION AND POSSIBLY FUTURE FAILURE.

AND AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE CALLED INTO THE EXPERTS WHO ACTUALLY TOLD US THAT THAT EQUIPMENT WAS OVER 20 YEARS OLD AND NEEDED REPLACEMENT.

IT IS NOT ABLE TO BE REPAIRED.

SO AT THIS POINT IN TIME, UM, MOTOROLA IS AN EXISTING, UH, APPROVED VENDOR.

THEY'RE CURRENTLY IN GOOD STANDING.

THIS REQUEST IS FOR $76,002, AS YOU MENTIONED.

AND DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE EXISTING EQUIPMENT, WE'RE REQUESTING, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, THIS CONTRACT BE AWARDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH ME AS TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST ERIC LARSON, WHO'S BEEN WORKING ON THIS PROJECT, AND HE'S HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.

THANK YOU.

UM, FIRST I NEED TO INQUIRE OF A QUESTION TO MY COLLEAGUE HERE, OR COLLEAGUES.

'CAUSE I THINK BOTH HAVE WORKED ON THIS ISSUE.

UM, THE 9 1 1, UH, EMERGENCY FUNDS, UH, THOSE WERE SPECIFIC TO COMMUNICATIONS RELATED OPPORTUNITIES TO SUPPORT FOR OUR POLICE DEPARTMENTS.

[00:15:01]

RIGHT? I I REMEMBER, I RECALL THERE, THERE THERE'S A LITTLE MORE LATITUDE THAN JUST COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, RIGHT? BUT, BUT THAT WOULD BE ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU COULD COVER FROM 9 1 1 FUNDS.

YES.

MM-HMM .

AND THE ONLY REASON WHY I BRING THAT UP IS BECAUSE TO THIS, THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE, IT'S OPPOSED TO BRINGING IT OUTTA THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BUDGET.

I WOULD SUGGEST MAYBE WE CONSIDER THE 9 1 1 FUND BECAUSE IT'S A ONE TIME THING FOR A LONGER AMOUNT OF TIME.

I DON'T KNOW, MR. XAVIER, I DON'T KNOW.

THIS IS JUST FLYING OFF THIS MOMENT, BUT I, AND I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T THINK THIS IS SOMETHING YOU COULD HAVE BUDGETED FOR WITHOUT HAVING DONE, UH, THE RESPONSE YOU DID.

SO I, I DON'T WANT TO BURDEN THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT WITH THAT.

AND IF WE HAVE THAT FUND, COULD, COULD WE GET AN AMENDMENT READY FOR A THREE O'CLOCK ? YES.

.

OR IF THE EXECUTIVE HAS ANY OPINION? I MEAN, I THINK, UH, ASSUMING THERE'S FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE 9 1 1 FUND YEAH.

9 MILLION BUCKS.

UM, AND WE'RE JUST, WE WOULD JUST BE CHANGING THE FUND LINE.

I MEAN, IF THAT'S WHAT THE PARTIES WOULD REQUEST, I WOULD IMAGINE WE COULD HAVE THAT DONE.

MR. WE WE HAVE MARK HELPING US OUT IDENTIFYING 9 1 1 NEEDS FROM DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITIES.

SO THIS DEFINITELY WOULD FIT IN THERE.

I DON'T WANNA DELAY MOVING ON THIS.

COULD WE, WE CAN, WE CAN WORK WITH THE BUDGETS.

WE CAN COME BACK TO THE LEGISLATURE TOO AND ASK THAT THE 9 1 1, DO A SUBSEQUENT FUND TRANSFER.

YES.

OKAY.

I, I'M FINE.

I JUST WANT TO THROW THAT UP.

I THINK IT'S A GREAT IDEA.

WE OUGHT USE THAT.

I I WOULD PROPOSE THAT WE MOVE ON THIS AND GET IT DONE AND PASSED AND THEN COME BACK TO IT AND REVISIT WHERE THOSE FUNDS ACTUALLY GO TO THERE.

GO, GO FROM, OKAY.

WOULD THAT EFFORT, AYE.

SEEK A MOTION THEN MOVE TO ADOPT.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND THEN MOVING, SECONDED.

UM, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED, UH, THE AYES HAVE, THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

RESOLUTION 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 5

[22245 A RESOLUTION declaring certain County-owned vehicles as surplus property and authorizing their disposal pursuant to Chapter 11 of Jackson County Code, 1984.]

A RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN COUNTY ONLY VE COUNTY OWNED VEHICLES AS SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 11 OF JACKSON COUNTY CODE 1 9 8 4 CAP OR SOMEONE? YEAH.

GOOD AFTERNOON.

DOLORES WELLS, UH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF THE DETENTION CENTER.

AND SO THESE ARE SOME OF OUR VANS THAT ARE PRETTY MUCH OUTTA COMMISSION.

AND SO WE'RE WANTING TO GET 'EM, UH, PROPERLY SURPLUS SO THAT WE'RE NOT MOVING THEM AND HAVING TO PAY TO MOVE 'EM FROM WHERE THEY ARE TO THE NEW FACILITY.

AND THEY'RE NOT IN USE USE, UH, WHERE ARE THEY NOW? JUST TO, THEY'RE IN MULTIPLE PLACES.

, A COUPLE OF 'EM ARE IN, WE GOT DIFFERENT GARAGES.

SO THERE'S SOME HERE, SOME THERE.

I KNOW.

OKAY.

UM, UH, IS THERE A, SO I THINK THIS IS GONNA COME UP A COUPLE TIMES, SO I WANNA BRING IT UP TO THE, TO THE BODY NOW.

UM, I WAS IN BUCKNER YESTERDAY TO, AT THE REQUEST OF, UH, THEIR CITY TO TALK TO THEM ABOUT, UM, I THINK SEVERAL ISSUES, BUT ONE CAME UP ABOUT THE NEED FOR, UM, VEHICLES, UM, AND THE OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO POTENTIALLY SHARE, UM, IN SOME OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF OUR SURPLUS VEHICLES.

SO I TALKED TO THE GENERAL COUNSEL'S OFFICE EARLIER TODAY, UH, TO INQUIRE ABOUT THAT POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIAL OF A INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER PROGRAM FOR IN THIS SITUATION.

SOUNDS LIKE THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO COME GET IT, TAKE IT OFF OUR HANDS AND GET IT OUT OF THERE.

UM, I WOULD LIKE TO EXPLORE THAT WITHOUT DISTRIBUTING THIS, BECAUSE I THINK THIS DEDICATES US TO ACTUALLY HAVING TO PUT IT ON PURPLE WAVE, WHICH CREATES OTHER ISSUES.

SO IF IT'S OKAY, AND WE CAN HOLD IT, MR. EXECUTIVE, IT'S OKAY IF THESE STAY IN A SPOT FOR A WEEK OR TWO WHILE WE FIGURE THIS OUT.

UH, I'D LIKE TO HOLD THIS IN THE SURPLUS EFFORTS JUST TO WORK THROUGH THAT OPPORTUNITY.

IT'S FINE BY THE ADMINISTRATION OKAY.

AS WELL AS ANY ISSUE.

UM, YOU KNOW, AS LONG AS THEY DON'T HAVE LIKE CRITERIA WHERE THEY DON'T ACCEPT THEM.

YEAH.

BECAUSE THESE ARE LIKE 125,000 MILES.

OH YEAH.

THEY'RE UP THERE TO THEM.

THEY, THEY HAVE LIKE THREE, SO WE JUST DON'T WANNA BE 20-YEAR-OLD VOTE FOR HAVING TO PAY TO TOW 'EM.

MM-HMM .

KNOWING THAT THEY DON'T WORK.

YEAH, I, I AGREE WITH YOU.

I DON'T WANT TO MOVE EM THREE OR FOUR TIMES.

I THINK THAT THIS, THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO HELP SOME OF OUR MUNICIPALITIES WITH THESE VEHICLES AND THAT 3000, THEY PROBABLY PAY FOR THE SCRAP.

THEY COULD PUT IT TOWARDS TRANSMISSION OR SOMETHING ELSE MAYBE.

SO, WE'LL, WE'LL WORK THROUGH THAT AND I'LL WORK WITH YOU MR. EXECUTIVE AND OTHERS TO FIGURE THAT OUT.

UM, YEAH, SO IF WE CAN HOLD 2, 2, 2, 4, 5, UH, WE'LL, WE'LL TAKE THAT UP, UM, AS WE GET SOME MORE DETAILS.

UH, 2, 2 2 4 7

[22247 A RESOLUTION transferring $150,000.00 within the 2025 County Improvement Fund to cover costs for inmate clothing and costs associated with relocating items from the Detention Center at 1300 Cherry Street, Kansas City, Missouri, to the East Campus at 7000 E. U.S. 40 Highway.]

A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING 150,000 WITHIN THE 2025 COUNTY IMPROVEMENT FUND TO COVER COSTS FOR INMATE CLOTHING AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH RELOCATING ITEMS FROM THE DETENTION CENTER AT 1300 CHERRY STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, TO EAST CAMPUS AT 7,000 EAST, US 40 HIGHWAY.

MS. WELS, UM, THIS, I'M DOLORES WELLS GETTING DETENTION CENTER.

UM, THIS IS BASICALLY A REQUEST TO TRANSFER MONEY THAT WE HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED IN THE COUNTY IMPROVEMENT FUND.

WHEN THE MONEY WAS PUT IN, IT WAS ALL PUT INTO ONE ACCOUNT.

SO THIS IS JUST TO GET IT IN THE RIGHT ACCOUNT SO THAT WE'RE PAYING FOR THE RIGHT THINGS FROM THE RIGHT PLACES.

UM, BUT WE'VE BEEN HAVING TO MOVE THINGS USING, UH, THE MOVE, THE COUNTY MOVING, UH, COMPANY A ARNOLD.

UM, AND THERE'S THE BIGGER THINGS LIKE THE KITCHEN, THE THINGS LIKE SHELVES AND, AND WARMERS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

SO,

[00:20:01]

UM, WE WANNA MAKE SURE WE HAVE THE RIGHT MONEY IN THE RIGHT ACCOUNTS AND THEN TO GET THE REST OF THE CLOTHING WE NEED FOR THE INMATES.

AND THEN I'M JUST HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY ON THAT.

UM, I DO, IN FACT, SO THIS IS THE NEW JAIL TRANSFER OF EFFORTS.

UM, ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'VE DELAYED JUSTICE AND LAW IS TO SEEK AN OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR MORE ABOUT THE TRANSITION PROCESS FROM OLD FACILITY TO NEW FACILITY.

UM, IN THIS TRANSFER, DO WE CREATE ANY ADDITIONAL, UH, BED SPACE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? 'CAUSE I, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT OUR POPULATION IN THE CURRENT FACILITY IS A LOT LARGER THAN OUR ABILITY TO HOLD THEM IN THE NEW SPACE.

SO IS, IS ANY OF THIS FUND DOING ANYTHING TO CREATE MORE SPACE? WELL, NONE OF THIS TRANSFER HERE HAS ANY RELATION TO THE INMATE COUNT OR POPULATION OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

THIS IS JUST SIMPLY US TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT WHEN WE CREATE THAT PO FOR THE MOVING SERVICE, THAT WE'RE DOING IT OUT OF THE CORRECT FUND AND THE CORRECT ACCOUNT.

SO YEAH, THIS, I'M NOT THE EXPERT ON THE POPULATION OR ANY OF THOSE THINGS.

WELL, AND I GET WHAT YOU'RE ASKING BECAUSE I, MY CONCERN THOUGH IS IF THAT THERE IS A REQUEST FOR TRANSFERRING BEDS THAT WILL COME THROUGH THIS MONEY, UM, AND IF WE'RE TRANSFERRING BEDS INTO SPACES THAT ARE NOT, WERE NOT INTENDED TO HOLD, UH, THE CAPACITY.

I, I THINK THAT IS A QUESTION OF BROADER CONCEPT THAT WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT.

SO FOR THIS EXAMPLE, LIKE WHEN WE MOVE THE THINGS FROM ADMINISTRATION, THESE ARE THE SAME MOVERS THAT PHYSICALLY CAME AND GOT OUR BOXES.

THEY'RE GONNA GET OUR KITCHEN SUPPLIES.

WE HAVE PROBABLY ALMOST MAYBE 1500 FOOD TRAYS AND THOSE ARE LIKE STACKABLE PLASTIC TRAYS THAT HAVE TO PHYSICALLY BE MOVED FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER.

SO IT'S THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT WE DON'T HAVE THE MANPOWER OTHER THAN TO PAY A MOVEMENT SERVICE.

SO YEAH, THIS WOULDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT.

THIS IS STRICTLY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GET OUR PHYSICAL ITEMS MOVED OVER FROM THE DIFFERENT AREAS.

WE HAVE POPULATION CONTROL, WE HAVE, UH, THE REST OF THE THINGS THAT ADMINISTRATION THINGS FROM THE KITCHEN, UH, THINGS FROM THE OTHER LITTLE UNITS THAT ARE ACTUALLY COMING WITH US.

SO WE DON'T HAVE LIKE, MANPOWER TO DO THAT IN HOUSE.

AND THEN THE OTHER DIFFERENCE IS THE MONEY THAT WE NEED FOR THE REMAINING, UH, INMATE CLOTHES THAT WE'VE BEEN PURCHASING.

SO YEAH, THIS IS NOT TIED TO THE COUNT AND THE NUMBERS OR ANY OF THAT.

THIS IS MORE RELATED TO STAFF STUFF AND OUR REGULAR EVERYDAY OPERATING THINGS.

UH, QUESTION, COMMENTS, THOUGHTS FROM COLLEAGUES? UM, I, I THINK IN THIS SITUATION I, I'VE GOT MORE QUESTIONS, UM, THAT I HAVE SOUGHT ANSWERS FOR THAT WE'VE YET TO GET.

UM, PARTICULARLY AS IT TALKS ABOUT THE MOVE AND TRANSITION.

I KNOW THAT I'VE TALKED TO CAPTAIN MONTGOMERY AND OTHERS.

UM, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE MOVE OR THAT PROCESS OR THE TRANSFERS.

IT'S JUST I THINK THAT WE HAVE VERY LIMITED OPPORTUNITIES TO INQUIRE ABOUT SOME OF THIS STUFF.

AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS WE DON'T HAVE ANY INFORMATION.

SO, MR. EXECUTIVE, IF YOU'VE GOT ANYTHING, WELL, THIS SPECIFICALLY THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT.

I THINK YOUR CONCERNS OR ISSUES ARE IF, IF THE, UH, DETENTION CENTER PURCHASES NEW BEDS AND ARE BROUGHT THERE, THIS IS ONLY MOVING EXISTING THING.

SO IF THAT, IF THAT WAS AN ISSUE ABOUT BRINGING IN NEW BEDS, THAT'S GONNA BE AN ISSUE TO COME BEFORE THIS BODY TO PURCHASE THAT.

IT'D BE A WHOLE DIFFERENT ISSUE.

I'M, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT HOLDING ANY OF THIS UP BECAUSE, UH, HOLDS THE DEAL TO, TO REPORT BACK TO YOU WHEN THE, THE ACTUAL TRANSITION, THE MOVE IS GOING TO BE, UH, WE'RE NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO SAY THAT BE FOR SECURITY ISSUE, BUT YOU'RE GONNA KNOW BEFORE, BUT TO YOUR ISSUE, I THINK YOU'RE RAISING IS THE BIGGER ISSUE OF POPULATION CONTROL AND THE NUMBER OF INMATES IN THAT NEW FACILITY.

DEFINITELY A CONCERN THAT THIS BODY SHOULD HAVE.

THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS ONE TOO.

UM, I, I HEAR YOU AND, AND I'LL MAKE SURE I VISIT WITH THE SHERIFF IN CORRECTIONS.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT? BUT I I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THIS ISSUE HERE.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT MM-HMM .

UM, BUT STILL VALIDATING YOUR CONCERN ABOUT WANTING SOME INFORMATION.

YEAH.

AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS IT'S NOT THE PURCHASE OF NEW BEDS, IT'S THE TRANSFER OF BEDS THAT WE ALREADY HAVE, WHICH IS A MOVE PROCESS.

SO IF THAT'S NOT THE CASE, I, I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.

BUT THAT'S YOUR ALL'S MOTION EFFORT.

I MOVE TO THE MOVE TO THE SECOND IT MOVE AND SECONDED ALL THOSE IN FOR ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? APPEARS AYES HAVE IT.

THE AYE DO AYES DO AND NEED HABIT RESOLUTION

[22253 A RESOLUTION transferring $305,509.00 within the County Improvement Fund and awarding a contract for the purchase of mobile radios to include software licenses, programming, and chargers for use by the Sheriff’s Office Detention Center to Motorola Solutions, Inc., of Chicago, IL, under the terms and conditions of KC/RPC Contract No. 34733, an existing competitively bid government contract, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $305,509.00.]

2 2 2 5 3 RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING $305,509 WITHIN THE COUNTY IMPROVEMENT FUND AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF MOBILE RADIOS TO INCLUDE SOFTWARE LICENSES, PROGRAMMING CHARGES FOR USE BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE DETENTION CENTER TO MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.

OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF KC RPC CONTRACT NUMBER 3 4 7 3 3, AN EXISTING COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT IN AN ACTUAL COST OF THE COUNTY IN THE AMOUNT OF $305,509.

IS THAT YOU, MS. WELL, AGAIN, DELORIS, WELL STILL STANDING, UM, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION AT THE DETENTION CENTER.

AND SO THIS IS JUST OUR REQUEST TO, UH, BASICALLY GET, UH,

[00:25:01]

THE CONTRACT AWARD SO THAT WE CAN PURCHASE THE RADIOS THAT ARE NEEDED AND WE'RE USING A PREEXISTING, UH, COMPETITIVELY BIG CONTRACT WITH MOTOROLA.

UH, THE ONLY THING I'D SAY TO THIS IS, AGAIN, I THINK THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY IF WE CONSIDER THE 9 1 1 FUND.

AGAIN, THIS IS MAKING IT, UH, ACCESSIBLE FOR US FOR A ONE-TIME PURCHASE OF A MULTI-YEAR USE.

BUT, UM, AGAIN, TO THE MR. EXECUTIVE'S POINT, WE COULD FIGURE THAT OUT AFTER THE FACT.

SO, UM, ANY ADDITIONAL RADIOS THAT WE'RE REPLACING DUE TO ADDITIONAL MANPOWER? 'CAUSE I KNOW, I THINK WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THAT.

I THINK MR. EXECUTIVE, YOU MENTIONED IT IN, UH, THE BUDGETING DOCUMENTS YOU SUBMITTED TO US AS WELL, BUT ANYTHING, NOT AT THIS POINT.

OKAY.

NOW WHEN WE GET THE BODIES PHYSICALLY THERE SURE.

THEN WE WILL, YOU KNOW, CROSS.

OKAY.

BECAUSE WHAT HELPS US WITH THE RADIOS IS THAT EVERYBODY'S NOT AT WORK AT THE SAME TIME.

SO WE HAVE SOME FLEXIBILITY WHERE IF WE DON'T HAVE ONE FOR EVERY SINGLE PERSON, THEY'RE NOT ALL THERE TO EVEN FOR THE WORLD CUP .

FAIR ENOUGH.

ALL RIGHT.

UH, QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, THOUGHTS, MOTIONS, MOVE TO DOTS.

I SECOND.

SECOND.

MOVED AND SECONDED.

OKAY.

UH, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? AYE, UH, APPEAR TO HAVE IT.

THE EYES DO INDEED HAVE IT.

UH, RESOLUTION 2 2 2 5 4.

[22254 A RESOLUTION awarding a contract for the purchase of two Kubota utility vehicles for use by the Sheriff’s Office Detention Center to Coleman Equipment, Inc., of Lee’s Summit, MO under the terms and conditions of Sourcewell Contract No. 112624, an existing, competitively bid government contract, at an actual cost to the County in the amount of $57,751.00.]

A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT WITH THE PURCHASE OF TWO KOBOTA UTILITY VEHICLES FOR THE USE BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE DETENTION CENTER TO COLEMAN EQUIPMENT INC.

OF LEE SUMMIT, MISSOURI.

UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SOURCE, WELL CONTRACT 1 1 2 6 2 4, AN EXISTING CO COMPETITIVELY BID GOVERNMENT CONTRACT AT AN ACTUAL COST IN COUNTY THE AMOUNT OF $57,751.

TO WHOM? DOLORES SWIFT.

ALL RIGHT.

DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION.

UM, SO THIS IS OUR ATTEMPT TO PURCHASE TWO, UH, UTILITY VEHICLES.

I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY TIMES YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN THERE, BUT IT'S A LOT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE.

SO THIS WILL BE VERY HELPFUL FOR SEVERAL THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON WITHIN THE PROPERTY.

SO WE, UM, ARE PLANNING TO USE A, UM, A CONTRACT THAT'S ALREADY A GOVERNMENT COMPETITIVELY BID CONTRACT.

AND THIS IS KIND OF JUST A ONE-OFF TYPE OF THING.

IT'S NOT AN ONGOING PURCHASE THAT WE'D BE DOING OVER AND OVER.

SO I'M JUST HERE IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT.

QUESTIONS, COMMENTS.

THIS IS FOR THE NEW FACILITY, RIGHT? MM-HMM .

FOR THE NEW BUILDING, SEEKING A MOTION, MOVE TO ADOPT.

SECOND.

SECONDED, UH, ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE.

AYE.

AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? APPEARS AYE HAVE AYE DO INDEED HAVE IT ANY NEW BUSINESS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE? WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED AT TWO 30.

ALL.