* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:04] IT'S 2 0 5. THE FINANCE AUDIT COMMITTEE WILL COME TO ORDER. WE HAVE, UH, COMMITTEE, UM, WE HAVE, UH, A RESOLUTION AWARD OF 12 MONTH TERM SUPPLY CONTRACT WITH TWO 12 MONTH OPTIONS. MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE [RESOLUTIONS IN COMMITTEE] [22252 A RESOLUTION awarding a twelve month term and supply contract, with two (2) twelve month options to extend, for the furnishing of end user computing, peripherals, device lifecycle management solutions and associated services at discounted rates for use by various County departments to Dell Marketing, LP of Round Rock, TX under the terms and conditions of Midwestern Higher Education Compact Contract No. MHEC-04152022 an existing competitively bid government contract.] RESOLUTION 2 2 2 5 2 RECOMMENDS ADOPTING THE DELL MIDWESTERN HIGHER EDUCATION COMPACT CONTRACT AS A TERM SUPPLY CONTRACT VEHICLE TO STREAMLINE THE PROCUREMENT OF ENTERPRISE IT SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES. LEVERAGING THIS AGREEMENT ENABLES THE ORGANIZATION TO ACCESS COMPETITIVELY SOLICITED PRICING, STANDARDIZED TERMS, AND PRE-VETTED OFFERINGS WITHOUT UNDERTAKING A FULL INDEPENDENT PROCUREMENT PROCESS, THEREBY REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN AND ACCELERATING TIME TO DEPLOYMENT. UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE COUNTY WOULD, WOULD BE ABLE TO PRODUCE, EXCUSE ME, BE ABLE TO PROCURE A COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO OF DELL TECHNOLOGIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING SERVER AND IF AND STRUCTURE STORAGE SOLUTIONS, CYBERSECURITY SOLUTIONS, FINANCIAL SERVICES, WHICH IS THE DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, AND UTILIZE THE MHEC CONTRACT AS A TERM AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT. PROVIDES SEVERAL KEY ADVANTAGES OF PROCUREMENT, EFFICIENCY, COST COMPETITIVENESS, STANDARDIZATION, FLEXIBILITY AND RISK MITIGATION. ADOPTING THIS CONTRACT POSITIONS THE ORGANIZATION TO RESPOND MORE RAPIDLY TO TECHNOLOGY NEEDS, MAINTAIN FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENSURE ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC IT OBJECTIVES. ANY QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR THOUGHTS? ALL RIGHT, ANY MOTIONS? SO MOVED. OKAY, SO THEN MOVED. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. MOVED AND SECONDED. UM, ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION 2 2 2 5 2. PLEASE INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE. AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? APPEARS THE AYES HAVE IT. THE AYES DO INDEED HAVE IT. 2, 2 2 5 2 WILL BE RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION OUT OF COMMITTEE. 2 2 2 6 7 [22267 A RESOLUTION awarding a thirty-six-month term and supply contract for the furnishing of testing, inspections, and monitoring of the fire detection and notification systems for use by the Public Works Department, to Siemens Industry, Inc. of Alpharetta, GA, under the terms and conditions set forth in Sourcewell Contract No. 30910, an existing competitively bid government contract.] A RESOLUTION AWARD, THE 36 MONTH TERM SUPPLY CONTRACT FOR THE FURNISHING OF TESTING INSPECTIONS AND MONITORING FOR THE FIRE DETECTION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OF SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. OF AFRA READY, GEORGIA. UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN SOURCEFUL CONTRACT NUMBER 3 0 9 1 0 AND EXISTING COMPETITIVELY BID GOVERNMENT CONTRACT. MR. EXECUTIVE, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE, RESIDENT 2 2 2 6 7 AUTHORIZE A CONTRACT WITH SIEMENS INDUSTRY TO SERVICE, INSPECT, TEST, AND MONITOR FIRE DETECTION AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEMS. THE FIRE ALARM AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR THE NEW DETENTION CENTER IS MADE BY SIEMENS INDUSTRY. THIS IS A LARGE AND COMPLEX SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES ESSENTIAL LIFE SAFETY FUNCTIONS FOR THE CENTER. TO ILLUSTRATE THE SIZE OF THE SYSTEM, THERE ARE ABOUT 3000 FIELD DEVICES IN THE SYSTEM, WHICH REQUIRE INSPECTION AND TESTING. AS WITH MOST TECHNICAL PRODUCTS, SIEMEN USES PROPRIETY OPERATING SYSTEMS, PARTS AND SOFTWARE. LIFE SAFETY CODES REQUIRE THAT THESE SYSTEMS BE ROUTINELY TESTED AND INSPECTED BY QUALIFIED PEOPLE. AND SIEMENS PROVIDES TECHNICIANS SPECIFICALLY TRAINED ON THIS EQUIPMENT FOR THE ONGOING OPERATION. MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM FOR FACILITIES MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDS AWARDING THIS CONTRACT UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SOURCE. WELL, CONTRACT 3 0 9 1 OH AN EXISTING COMPETITIVELY BID GOVERNMENT CONTRACT. I DO HAVE WHITNEY MILLER WITH THE COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE. I DO HAVE AN AMENDMENT THAT WE RECEIVED FOR THIS, UH, CORRECTING THE CONTRACT NUMBER, WHICH I'LL HAND OUT INSTEAD OF 3 0 9 1 OH. IT IS 1 2 1 24 DASH SIE. UH, AND THEN IF YOU LOOK AT THE TOP, WHEREAS CLAUSE, INSTEAD OF A COST OF 125,000, IT'S CHANGED TO 4 20 26, A COST OF 136,383 AND 31 CENTS, AND WE'LL INCREASE IN PRICE OVER THE FOLLOWING TWO YEARS. SO I HAVE THAT TO HAND OUT TO YOU. NOW, INCREASE BY WHAT PERCENTAGE? YEAH, AND IT'S A SOLE SOURCE. IT'S A TERM AND SUPPLY THAT WENT OUT TO BID. IT'S A BID CONTRACT, BUT THE 125, I THINK WAS INCORRECT. AND IT'S ACTUALLY 136,000 INSTEAD OF 125,000. MR. CHAIR? UH, YES. LET'S DO, ALLOW, WHO IS THE SPONSOR OF THE AMENDMENT? THE CHAIR. OH, THE AMENDMENT. . WE, I'M GONNA GET IN TROUBLE FOR THIS, BUT WE JUST KEPT THE SAME SPONSOR, WHICH IS LEGISLATOR OF BARCA. TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST, I WAS DISTRACTED AND DID NOT, UM, [00:05:01] I DID NOT HANDLE THIS AMENDMENT. SO I, I DON'T KNOW HOW THE MISTAKE OCCURRED, BUT I, YOU KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING WE WANNA KNOW, BUT I THINK, I THINK IT WAS JUST A, EITHER A MISTAKE IN THE RLA OR A MISTAKE IN THE DRAFTING QUESTION. LEGISLATIVE P UM, MY QUESTION IS AROUND, UM, THE INCREASE EVERY TWO YEARS. RIGHT NOW THERE'S NO LIMIT ON THAT INCREASE OR IT'S LEFT WIDE OPEN. WE'RE AGREEING TO AN INCREASE AND THEY COULD MAKE THAT INCREASE WHATEVER THEY WANT IT TO BE. CAMPAIGN, IF YOU LOOK IN THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, IT IS ACTUALLY A SET AMOUNT FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO YEARS. UM, BUT THIS, THE DOCUMENTATION WE HAVE HAS THIS IN THERE FOR THE AMENDMENT. WE COULD AMEND IT TO ACTUALLY PUT THE AMOUNT IN IF YOU WOULD LIKE FOR US TO DO THAT. BUT THE CONTRACT ITSELF, WHICH IS ATTACHED TO THE LEGISLATION AND REGISTRAR HAS THE ACTUAL AMOUNTS FOR 27 AND 28. THOSE HAVEN'T BEEN APPROPRIATED YET. SO WE, AND THEY'RE SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION, SO WE DIDN'T PUT THOSE IN. BUT IF YOU WOULD PREFER THAT THEY BE IN, WE COULD CERTAINLY AMEND IT TO, TO ADD THAT IN. AND I THINK THE QUESTION, I'M HAVING THE QUESTION, WHITNEY, BECAUSE, UM, IT'S UNDERLINED, THANK YOU. NOT ONLY WITH THE PRICE BUT ABOUT THE INCREASE. SO EVEN IF THERE WERE AN INCREASE, I MEAN, AND IT IS THE INCREASES THAT ARE IN THE ORIGINAL, IT WOULD INDICATE TO ME BECAUSE THIS IS UNDERLINED, THAT IT DOESN'T JUST FALL BACK JUST BECAUSE THIS IS PART OF THE AMENDMENT, THE TWO YEARS AND THIS IS PART OF THE AMENDMENT, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. MR. CHAIRMAN? UH, YES, MR. EXECUTIVE PLEASURE. PEYTON, WOULD YOU BE MORE COMFORTABLE IF WE HELD THIS, WE WENT BACK AND INCLUDED THE AMENDMENT INTO ONE RLA AND THEN ALSO IDENTIFIED SPECIFICALLY THE AMOUNTS THAT THE CONTRACT WOULD INCREASE EVERY YEAR WITHOUT ANY SORT? I WOULD, YES. THANK YOU. OKAY. AND JUST HOLD THIS ONE AND, ALRIGHT, SO UNLESS THERE'S ANY OBJECTION, WE'LL JUST HOLD 2 2 2 6 7 2 2 2 7 3 [22273 A RESOLUTION awarding a twelve-month term and supply contract, with two (2) twelve-month options to extend, for the furnishing of services to post notice for use by the Jackson County Collection Department to Friend in the Business, LLC of Kansas City, MO, under the terms and conditions of Request for Proposals No. 26-014.] A RESOLUTION AWARDING A 12 MONTH TERM AND SUPPLY CONTRACT WITH TWO 12 MONTH OPTIONS TO EXTEND FOR THE FURNISHING OF SERVICES TO POST NOTICE FOR USE BY THE JACKSON COUNTY COLLECTION DEPARTMENT TO FRIEND IN THE BUSINESS LLC OF KANSAS CITY UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NUMBER 2 6 0 1 4, MR. EXECUTIVE MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE TO CARRY OUT THE 2026 TAX SALE, WHICH IS SCHEDULED FOR AUGUST, THE COUNTY NEEDED TO SECURE THIRD PARTY SERVICE TO POST NOTICE OF THE SALE ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES SUBJECT TO THE SALE POSTING NOTICE IN THIS WAY IS SET OUT IN COUNTY CODE REQUIREMENT 2 1 2 8 AND CHAPTER 21, WHICH STATES THE COLLECTING AUTHORITY SHALL ENTER UPON PROPERTY SUBJECT TO FORECLOSURE OF TAX LIEN AND POST A WRITTEN INFORMATIONAL NOTICE IN ANY CONSPICUOUS LOCATION. ONSET PROPERTY RIGHT NOW, COLLECTION STAFF DO NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY NOR SECURITY PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT POSTING AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY CODE. SO IT NEED TO GET THIS RESOLUTION PASSED OUTTA COMMITTEE TODAY AND ADOPTED AT TODAY'S LEGISLATIVE MEETING. UH, THEN THE, IF WE CAN'T, THE COUNTY'S ABILITY TO HOLD THE 20 26 20 26 TAX FORCE CLOSURE SALE PURSUANT TO THE COUNTY CODES IS JEOPARDIZED DUE TO A NOTICE PERIOD CONSTRAINTS. UM, WE NEED TO GET THIS OUT. IT'D BE TOO LATE TO BRING IT BACK FOR CONSIDERATION AT A LATER MEETING, IF THAT MAKES SENSE. QUESTIONS? UM, VICE CHAIR SMITH? YEAH, MY APOLOGIES. I, I, UM, WASN'T REALLY LISTENING AND THEN I KIND OF HEARD OUTTA THE CORNER OF MY EAR. I'M LIKE, OH, THAT SOUNDS INTERESTING. UHHUH . UM, SO I HAVE, UM, SUBMITTED LEGISLATION. IT'S BEEN I THINK IN THE RLA PROCESS NOW FOR TWO OR THREE WEEKS WHERE WE WOULD PUT A MORATORIUM ON TAX SALES AS THEY RELATE TO THE 2023 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS. AS WE'VE SEEN, THERE'S, YOU KNOW, SOME CONSIDERABLE CHALLENGES WITH THE DUE PROCESS THAT PEOPLE WERE AFFORDED AND ALL THAT STUFF. AND WE'VE SEEN THE NUMBERS SPIKE CONSIDERABLY AS FAR AS THE NUMBER OF SALES. UM, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING FULLY READ IN ON WHAT YOU GUYS WERE TALKING ABOUT, BUT I THINK WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IS THAT IF THE, IF WE DON'T MOVE ON SOMETHING, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DO A TAX SALE. THAT'S CORRECT. AND, AND, AND LR SMITH, THIS IS SPECIFICALLY FOR TAXES THAT WERE NOT PAID IN 20 22, 20 23 AND 2024. AND THERE, THERE ARE WAYS THAT PROPERTIES ARE PULLED OUT OF THAT TAX SALE ALSO, BUT I, I THINK AS WE'VE DISCUSSED BEFORE, NEXT YEAR'S GONNA BE THE REALLY BIG ISSUE. 'CAUSE WE KNOW 2320, WELL WE KNOW, WE KNOW THEY WERE BAD A LONG TIME AGO, BUT WE DO HAVE OFFICIAL NOTICE AND A, A RULING LEGAL AUTHORITY THAT 23 AND 24, UM, WERE PROBLEMATIC. AND THAT TIME WHEN IT'S 23 AND 24 AND 25 THAT ARE GOING TO THE TAX SALE, I THINK THAT'S WHERE A MORATORIUM CAN BE UTILIZED NOW BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THESE ARE 22, 23 AND 24 TO THREE, THREE YEARS. [00:10:02] SO I ACTUALLY JUST HAD A, A CONSTITUENT KANSAS CITY RESIDENT ACTUALLY, BUT, UM, THAT HAD 23 DELINQUENCY AND HAS RECEIVED NOTICE THAT SHE'S ON THE TAX SALE LIST. SO, AND SHE MUST HAVE BEEN DELINQUENT 22 AND 23. YEAH, I LOOKED AT HER ACCOUNT. THAT'S NOT THE CASE NOW. SO I JUST, I WANNA MAKE SURE WE A HUNDRED PERCENT KNOW THAT, THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOMEBODY HAS TO HAVE BEEN DELINQUENT ALL THE WAY BACK TO 22 TO PARTICIPATE THIS YEAR. CAN WE, CAN WE ADD LANGUAGE TO THIS SO THAT IT IS DECLARATIVE? WELL, A COUPLE DIFFERENT ISSUES. UH, NUMBER ONE, THIS IS ONLY THE PROCEDURAL THING THAT WE DON'T GET IN, IN LINE TO BE ABLE TO DO THE PROCESS OF GETTING THINGS POSTED. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ACTUALLY THE, UH, PROPERTIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN IT. SECONDLY, UM, WE, WE DO NEED TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER, FOR EXAMPLE, THE, THE CONFUSION OF SOMEONE WHO JUST GOT A LETTER SAYING THEY'RE BEHIND 23, 24 AND 25, THEY HAVE RECEIVED NOTICES COMING A TAX SALE, BUT THAT TAX SALE WILL BE NEXT SUMMER. CORRECT. COUNSELOR. SO IT'S 23, 24, 25, THEY WOULD BE THE, FOR THOSE YEARS THEY WOULD BE RECEIVING THEIR NOTICE OF PETITION FOR NEXT YEAR'S TAX SALE. CORRECT. SO THEY, THEY, THEY, THAT PERSON COULD HAVE GOT RECEIVED NOTICE THAT THEY ARE THEIR PROPERTY'S UP FOR A TAX SALE BASED ON NON-PAYMENT OF 23, 24, 25. BUT THAT PETITION GOES TO THE SALE OF 27. AUGUST OF 27. GOTCHA. RIGHT. NOW THESE, WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON GETTING A, A COMPANY TO GO OUT AND AND HELP GET THE POSTING ON THEM ARE ONLY FOR ANY PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN DELINQUENT 22 AND 23 AND 24. OKAY. THOSE ALSO HAVE THE ABILITY TO COME IN AND MAKE SOME PAYMENTS AND GET OFF THAT PETITION. THERE'S THERE'S CERTAIN WAYS THEY DO. YEAH. WE, WE'VE HELPED SOME PEOPLE TOGETHER. YEAH. SO, SO I I I ALSO SHARE YOUR CONCERN ABOUT THE PEOPLE, AND I'M JUST ASKING FOR THIS JUST SO THAT THE PUBLIC IS CLEAR AND WE ARE CLEAR, EVEN THOUGH THIS IS NOT, THIS IS PROCEDURAL. COULD, COULD WE AMEND IT THIS SO THAT IT DECLARATIVELY SAYS THAT THIS IS SPECIFICALLY FOR PEOPLE WHO WERE DELINQUENT SINCE AT LEAST 2022 AND NOT 23, 24, 25. I, I, I WOULD BE DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? AGREEABLE THAT YES. I, IF, IF, IF WE COULD JUST PUT IN THE, THE LANGUAGE, UM, THAT WE'RE ASKING FOR. THE, THE COLLECTING AUTHORITY IS ASKING FOR THIS CONTRACT TO HIRE THE COMPANY TO ENTER THE PROPERTY SUB SUBJECT TO A FORECLOSURE TAX LIEN AND POST INFORMATIONAL NOTICE ON IN ANY CONSPICUOUS LOCATION ON SAID PROPERTY ONLY RELATED TO PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN DELINQUENT IN SINCE AT LEASE SUBSEQUENT YEARS 22, 23 AND 24. OKAY. AND, AND THEN COULD WE ALSO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE NOTICES, UM, AND, AND PUT IT IN THE LANGUAGE, MAKE SURE THAT THOSE NOTICES, UM, CLEARLY SPELL OUT THAT WERE FLEXIBLE ABOUT HOW TO GET THEM OUT OF THAT STATUS. I I WOULD ALSO ADD, ADD MAKE SENSE LEGISLATOR THAT MAKE SENSE? MM-HMM . SO, SO THE, LIKE THE NOTICES I'VE SEEN IN THE PAST WERE LIKE YOUR HOME'S GOING ON THE MARKET. MM-HMM . CONTACT THE COURT. I LIKE IF, IF WE CAN MAKE IT SOUND SIMPLE LIKE PAY 10% OF YOUR BILL FROM THE OLDEST YEAR AND WE'LL REMOVE YOU FROM THE LIST OR LIKE SOMETHING, WHATEVER WE'RE WILLING TO ACCEPT TO, TO REMOVE THEM FROM THE LIST. I JUST, WE'VE HAD SO MUCH PROBLEMS, SO MUCH CONFUSION. I JUST FEEL LIKE WE WANNA BE CRYSTAL CLEAR WITH TAXPAYERS THAT WE'RE DOING EVERYTHING WE CAN TO KEEP THEM IN THEIR HOMES IF THEY'RE STILL IN THERE. I WOULD, I WOULD ADD THIS AND ALSO NOT LEAVE ABANDONED PROPERTIES SITTING AROUND. 'CAUSE THAT'S, I THINK WHAT A LOT OF THESE END UP BEING. I THINK WHAT WOULD BE EFFECTIVE, I WOULD ADD THIS TOO, ALSO TOO ANY POSTINGS THAT SAYS, UM, YOUR SUBJECT IS, IS SUBJECT TO TAX SALE BECAUSE OF YOUR DELINQUENCY IN 22, 23 AND 24. YEAH. THAT AND THEN ALSO TO, TO FIX THIS, TO ABIDE BY IT, HERE ARE THE, THE CERTAIN STEPS YOU MUST TAKE TO NOT BE ON THE, THE TAX SALE OF NEXT YEAR. YEAH. AND, AND I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO SPELL OUT ALL THAT LANGUAGE, BUT AT LEAST HAVE SOMETHING IN THIS THAT SAYS WE ARE MAKING SURE TAXPAYERS WITH THIS NOTICE ARE INFORMED. SO SORRY, LEGISLATIVE PAYTON. AND, AND I WOULD EVEN SAY, UM, LEGISLATOR SMITH THAT F THE NOTICES HAD A QR CODE AND IF THEY HAD A SPECIFIC WEBSITE TO GO TO, THEN THAT WOULD FULFILL THAT NOTICE BECAUSE UM, THAT'S GONNA BE A LOT. THE NOTICES ARE NOT THAT BIG. RIGHT. THAT'S GONNA BE A LOT. RIGHT. SO I WOULD SAY EVEN A QR CODE, THEY WOULD TAKE THEM TO THAT INFORMATION OR UM, DESIGNATED PAGE. JUST SO WE'RE JUST TRYING TO BE AS JUST FRIENDLY AS POSSIBLE. I AGREE. I AGREE WITH THAT. I AGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE THERE'S SOME, I THINK THERE'S SOME PEOPLE WHO MAYBE THEY WERE LATE IN 22 FOR WHATEVER REASON AND THEN ALL THE MESS IN 23, 24 AND THEY HEARD THAT THERE WAS GONNA BE ROLLBACKS AND THERE'S JUST PEOPLE WHO JUST SAT ON THEIR HANDS. AND I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT, UM, HARMING [00:15:01] ANY OF THOSE PEOPLE BECAUSE OF ALL THE CHALLENGES WE'VE HAD, UM, THE LAST FEW YEARS. SO AS CHAIRMAN, THANK YOU FOR THINKING ABOUT MR. EXECUTIVE. SO, SO WHAT I'M HEARING ABOUT, SPECIFICALLY ABOUT 2, 2, 2, 7 3, WHICH IS PROCEDURALLY TO GET US TO HIRE THE COMPANY THAT DOES THIS. UM, IF WE CAN ADD SOME LANGUAGE, WHICH I THINK HOPE WE CAN DO TODAY TO GET IT TO THE FULL LEGISLATURE, MY WHITNEY MILLER AT THE COUNTY COUNSELOR'S OFFICE. MY PROPOSAL, IF YOU'RE WILLING TO ACCEPT IT, WOULD BE TO PASS IT OUT OF COMMITTEE WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION AND I'LL TRY AND WORK SOMETHING UP WHILE WE SIT HERE AND THEN PROPOSE IT AS AN AMENDMENT DURING THE REGULAR MEETING. JUST AN IDEA. , I THINK. YEAH. COULD I READ KIND OF WHAT I THINK YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY SO THAT OKAY. AND IT'S NOT, I DON'T THINK IT'S JUST ME. I MEAN I YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. YOU NEED ALL OF US. YEAH. NEEDS TO KEEP SIMPLE ADDING SOMETHING THAT SAYS BE IT RESOLVED THAT, UH, THIS AGREEMENT WILL ONLY APPLY TO PARCELS THAT ARE DELINQUENT FOR THE YEARS 2022 AND WELL, AT LEAST AS FAR BACK AS 2022, I'LL WORDSMITH IT BETTER, BUT THAT'S THE GIST OF IT. YOUR FIRST YEAR OF OLYMPIANS CAN'T BE 23, 24, 25 AND BE IT RESOLVED THAT JACKSON COUNTY WILL TAKE ALL EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT, UM, OPPORTUNITIES TO BE REMOVED FROM THE TAX SALE ARE MADE CLEAR ON THE NOTICE POSTING. YEAH. SOMETHING LIKE, OKAY. THAT, THAT, THAT WOULD MAKE ME FEEL MUCH BETTER. UM, I, I WAS GONNA ASK MR. EXECUTIVE ACTUALLY ABOUT THE NUMBERS, DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE FOR FOLKS THAT ARE GONNA RECEIVE THESE NOTICES? 'CAUSE I KNOW THIS IS, I DO, I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME, BUT I CAN DEFINITELY TELL YOU. OKAY. YEAH, I THINK THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL, UH, COMING UP TO LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE, JUST SIMPLY BECAUSE I THINK THERE ARE A LOT MORE FOLKS HERE WHO ARE CAUGHT UP IN THE, UH, FORMER EXECUTIVES MONOTONOUS PROCESS OF, OF TAXATION AND, AND I FEAR THAT THEY'RE GONNA FALL VICTIMS TO LOSING THEIR HOMES AND WE'RE GONNA HAVE SENIORS AT LEAST IN THE TAIL END OF 23 AND 24, THAT MAY DESERVE A SECOND SHOT AT TRYING TO FIGURE THIS OUT. SO, UM, I DUNNO WHAT OPTIONS EXIST. I KNOW YOU HAVE SOME MORE AUTHORITY BY CHARTER THAN WE DO, UM, BUT THERE MAY BE SOME OPPORTUNITIES THERE TO TRY AND SAVE PEOPLE AND KEEP THEM IN THEIR HOMES. SO I JUST WANNA BE CAUTIOUS AS WE MOVE THIS FORWARD, UM, WITH THAT IN MIND. SO, UM, SO IS THERE A MOTION TO, I'M GUESSING ADVANCE TO LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION? SO MOVED. SECOND. OKAY. IT'S BEEN MOVED. AND SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, PLEASE INDICATE BY THE SIGN OF AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I'LL ABSTAIN. UM, ALL RIGHT. THE AYES HAVE, WE WILL ADVANCE TO LEGISLATURE AS A WHOLE, ANY OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.