[00:00:02]
FRANKLIN CALLING LAND USE COMMITTEE TO ORDER.
WITH US TODAY, WE HAVE RESOLUTION
[RESOLUTIONS IN COMMITTEE]
[22404 A RESOLUTION declaring certain County-owned land as surplus real property and authorizing the Administration to solicit bids for selling one (1) surplus parcel.]
22-404 DECLARING CERTAIN COUNTY-OWNED LAND A SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRATION TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR SELLING ONE SURPLUS PARCEL.[22405 A RESOLUTION declaring certain County-owned land as surplus real property and authorizing the Administration to solicit bids for selling two (2) surplus parcels.]
DECLARING CERTAIN COUNTY-OWNED LAND IS SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING ADMINISTRATION.[22417 A RESOLUTION authorizing the County Executive to execute two (2) permanent utility easements in favor of the Kansas City, MO Water Department, for a fee payable to the County.]
AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TO EXECUTE TWO PERMANENT UTILITIES IN FAVOR OF THE KANSAS CITY MISSOURI WATER DEPARTMENT FOR A FEE TABLE TO THE COUNTY.MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE, RESOLUTION 22-417 IS TO HELP GET EASEMENTS OVER BY THE DETENTION CENTER.
AS PART OF THE US 40 HIGHWAY WIDENING FOR THE NEW JACKSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER PROJECT, PORTIONS OF THE EXISTING WATER LINES HAD TO BE REPLACED OR RELOCATED INTO THE NEW WATER MAIN EASEMENTS.
KANSAS CITY MISSOURI, THROUGH ITS WATER SERVICE DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING TWO PERMANENT EASEMENTS FOR WATER MAINS ALONG THE NORTH SIDE AND PARALLEL TO US 40 HIGHWAY ALONG THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE INTERSECTION OF US 40 HIGHWAY AND EWING AVENUE.
UH, THE NEW 12 INCH DIAMETER METER MAINS HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND AS BUILT WATER MAINS PLANS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO BOTH KANSAS MISSOURI WATER SERVICES AND THE JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS.
THE RLA ATTACHMENTS ARE THE KANSAS CITY MISSOURI WATER SERVICES FORMS, THE EXHIBIT A, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, EXHIBIT B, THE SURVEY DRAWING TRACK MAPS AS SEPARATE PROJECTS FOR THE EAST WATER MAINS AND THE WEST WATER MAINS.
QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, JEANIE? CHAIR, UH, TO INQUIRE, WAS THIS CONSIDERED WHEN THE PLANS WERE PUT TOGETHER? I DON'T KNOW IF IT WAS OR NOT, OR IF IT'S SOMETHING THEY CAME ACROSS LATER WHEN THEY WERE WIDENING 40 HIGHWAY.
I THINK THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WASN'T PART OF OUR PROJECT, BUT AS OUR, OUR FACILITY WENT IN THERE AND THEY WERE ACTUALLY DOING SOME WORK ON THE ROAD ITSELF, THEY NEEDED MORE OF AN EASEMENT ALONG THAT FROM OUR PROPERTY.
IT SEEMS LIKE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AT SOME POINT.
I THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN, UM, AND I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WERE YEARS AGO JUST LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL PARCEL AND NOT LOOKING AT THE - I DON'T RECALL IT BEING PART OF IT.
CHAIR WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION.
OPPOSED? LAND USE WILL RECOMMEND 22417 FOR ADOPTION.
THERE'S NOTHING ELSE TO COME BEFORE LAND USE, WE ARE ADJOURNED.