* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.
          [00:00:02]
          CHARLIE FRANKLIN CALLING LAND USE TO ORDER. 
          WE HAVE WITH US TODAY JEANNIE LAUER. 
          WE HAVE OUR CHAIRMAN WITH US CHAIRWOMAN, AND WE HAVE VANESSA HUSKY ROUNDING OUT THE CAST. 
          [ORDINANCES IN COMMITTEE]
          [6146 AN ORDINANCE amending the zoning districts established pursuant to the Unified Development Code by rezoning a certain 7.70± acre tract from District AG (Agricultural) to District RR (Residential Ranchette).]
          [6147 AN ORDINANCE amending the zoning districts established pursuant to the Unified Development Code by rezoning a certain 3.00± acre tract from District AG (Agricultural) to District RE (Residential Estates).]
          [6148 AN ORDINANCE requesting a conditional use permit for a period of 90 years for a 175-foot self-supporting tower in District AG (Agricultural) on a 2,500 square foot tract at 35601 E. Old 40 Highway.]
          [6150 AN ORDINANCE amending the zoning districts established pursuant to the Unified Development Code by rezoning a certain 17.72± acre tract from District AG (Agricultural) to District RR (Residential Ranchette).]
          [6151 AN ORDINANCE requesting a conditional use permit for a period of 15 years for continued operation of a childcare center on a .49 ± tract at 3255 NW Duncan Road.]
          [6152 AN ORDINANCE requesting a conditional use permit for a period of fifty (50) years for a 195-foot self-supporting tower in District AG (Agricultural) on a 4,900 square foot tract at 2307 S. Buckner Tarsney Road.]
I'M GONNA WAVE THE READING ON 6 1 4, 6, 6, 1, 4, 7, 6, 1, 4, 8, 6, 1, 5 0 6 1 5 1 AND 6 1 5 2. 
          AND THOSE WILL WITHOUT OBJECTION, THEY'LL ALL BE HELD. 
          WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE FIRST THREE ON NOVEMBER THE NINTH AT ONE 30 AND THE OTHER THREE ON NOVEMBER THE 16TH AT ONE 30. 
          BOTH OF THOSE HERE 
          [RESOLUTIONS IN COMMITTEE]
          [22437 A RESOLUTION authorizing the County Executive to execute a termination agreement related to the lease with JTB Properties, LLC of Kansas City, MO and to accept a permanent easement to allow access to the property to Jackson County.]
WE HAVE A RESOLUTION AND COMMITTEE AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE TO EXECUTE A TERMINATION AGREEMENT RELATED TO THE LEASE WITH JBT PROPERTIES, LLC OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, AND TO ACCEPT A PERMANENT EASEMENT TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY OF JACKSON COUNTY. 
          DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? SO I GUESS, I THINK YOU DID WANT TO TALK ON THIS. 
          ANGIE, YOU GOT SOMETHING TO SAY ON THIS RESOLUTION? I DON'T, BUT I DO NEED THE EXECUTIVE WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT HIM. 
          WE CAN, WE CAN HOLD IT, PASS IT WITHOUT HIM OR I JUST SEE HE WAS JUST AROUND. 
          ALRIGHT. 
          IF NOT, I CAN GIVE THE BASICS. 
          OH, THERE WE GO. 
          2 1 4 2 7 4 3 7 2 2 4. 
          RIGHT. 
          MADAM CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE? UH, FIRST OF ALL, I JUST SPENT SOME TIME WITH MR. AROLIO AND HIS DAUGHTER. 
          UM, HE HAD RECEIVED INFORMATION ABOUT A PROPERTY HE OWNS ON TRUMAN ROAD THAT BACKS UP TO 14TH STREET. 
          HE LIVES AT 64 0 6 EAST TRUMAN ROAD AND THERE'S AN EASEMENT ISSUE OVER THERE. 
          THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT, BUT HE GOT AN EMAIL SAW 14TH STREET. 
          SO WE'RE TALKING TO HIM ABOUT THAT AND SEEING IF WE CAN HELP HIM TALK TO THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY. 
          WHAT THIS SPECIFICALLY IS, IS NEXT TO OUR PARKING LOT AND JTB PROPERTIES HAD AN EASEMENT ACROSS JACKSON COUNTY PROPERTY, OUR PARKING LOT AND JTB PROPERTIES HAS ASKED US TO RELEASE AND TERMINATE THAT EASEMENT AND TO GRANT US A PERMANENT EASEMENT TO GO OVER THEIR PROPERTY TO THE PROPERTY OWNED BY JACKSON COUNTY. 
          SO IT DID NOT HAVE ANY DO WITH THAT, THAT GENTLEMAN THAT WAS HERE, BUT THIS IS TO KIND OF CLEAR UP, IT'S OLD, A GRAVEL ROAD THAT THIS GUY JTB PROPERTIES HAD AN EASEMENT ON AND WE'RE TERMINATING THAT EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THEM. 
          THE CLEAREST MUD QUESTIONS ARE QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION. 
          JEANNIE, WHAT'S THE HISTORY ON THAT A LITTLE BIT. 
          WHAT, WHAT WAS IT BEING USED FOR? HE WAS USING IT AS A PARKING LOT AND IT'S THE STATE. 
          HE HAD HAD A CONTRACT WITH THE STATE, UH, TO PARK THERE AND NOW THE STATE ISN'T USING IT ANYMORE. 
          AND I, I'VE GONE BACK AND FORTH LIKE, I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU HAVE TO TERMINATE THE EASEMENT. 
          WE DON'T, WE DIDN'T HAVE AN ACCESS TO, HE CAME AND WANTED TO TERMINATE HIS EASEMENT. 
          I THINK HE, HIS CONCERN MIGHT BE A LIABILITY THAT HE HAS ANY OWNERSHIP PROPERTY OF THE EASEMENT. 
          MM-HMM . 
          SO IS THERE A BENEFIT TO US TO ACTUALLY HAVE THAT PROPERTY BACK? IT'S A BENEFIT FOR US TO HAVE A PERMANENT EASEMENT TO ACCESS JACKSON COUNTY. 
          RIGHT. 
          AND FOR HIM NOT TO HAVE AN EASEMENT OVER OUR PROPERTY. 
          SURE. 
          OKAY. 
          THANK YOU. 
          ENTERTAIN A MOTION. 
          MOTION TO ADOPT. 
          I SECOND. 
          ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. 
          AYE. 
          AYE. 
          OPPOSED? LAND USE WILL RECOMMEND 22 437 FOR ADOPTION. 
          THERE'S NOTHING ELSE TO COME BEFORE LAND USE. 
          VANESSA CAN LEAVE . 
          THANK YOU CHARLIE. 
          STAND ADJOURNED.
* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.